Skip to Content

Consumer Fraud Class Action Case Against Star Career Academy Results in 11 Million Dollar Judgment

By: RDKInteractive

Philadelphia, PA – November 13, 2015: A consumer fraud class action against an occupational school on behalf of those seeking certification as surgical technicians, Polanco v. Star Career Academy, ended with a Camden County jury awarding a $2.97 million sum that’s subject to trebling, interest and fees. The suit contended that Star Career Academy, which is based in New Jersey and has several campuses in the state as well as in neighboring states, continued to offer a surgical technology program even after the certificate earned in that program became largely unacceptable by employing hospitals due to a 2011 change in the law, according to Patricia Pierce and Ronald Greenblatt of Greenblatt, Pierce, Engle, Funt & Flores in Philadelphia, who, along with Thomas Marrone, represented the plaintiffs. The suit alleged that Star made misrepresentations in its externship and job information and statistics, and failed to advise students about the issues with the program certificate leading up and after the 2011 law change — all in violation of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act (CFA). The suit, filed in 2013, claimed as damages the sums paid for enrollment in the program. A class, consisting of anyone enrolled as of June 2011 or after, was certified last year, according to the lawyers. Star denied making misrepresentations in its job statistics and challenged class certification, they said. After a five-week trial before Camden County Superior Court Judge Anthony Pugliese, the jury on Oct. 29 found that Star had violated the CFA and awarded $2.97 million. Statutory trebling and interest raises the award to about $9.2 million, according to the lawyers. The plaintiffs now are seeking disgorgement of $6 million taken in by Star in the form of government grants for students, and, as per the CFA’s fee-shifting provision, will seek in excess of $2.5 million in fees, according to the lawyers. A hearing before Pugliese — for a determination on fees and any posttrial motions by Star, and for entry of judgement — is scheduled for January, the lawyers said. Michael Nicodema of Greenberg Traurig in Florham Park, Star’s counsel, didn’t return a call seeking comment on the verdict. Source: Suits & Deals: Consumer Fraud Case Against School, With Statutory Trebling, Yields $9.2M, November 13, 2015

Jets to pay $324,000 to cheerleaders to settle lawsuit over wages

By: RDKInteractive

In a move that could send a signal to teams in other NFL cities, the Jets have agreed to pay nearly $324,000 to cheerleaders to settle a class-action lawsuit in which women claimed they were cheated out of wages, ordered to practices but not paid and forced to cover work-related expenses, like makeup, hair care and transportation.

The lawsuit, settled Friday in state Superior Court in Bergen County, is one of several filed against NFL teams as the league faces pressure from lawmakers in New Jersey and other states to pay cheerleaders according to labor laws.

The settlement comes as the National Football League is contending with broader public relations fights over concussions and lawsuits brought by former players. It also occurs at a time when the NFL has toughened its domestic violence policy after Commissioner Roger Goodell apologized in August 2014 for his handling of an incident in an Atlantic City hotel in which a surveillance camera captured player Ray Rice knocking his fiancée unconscious in an elevator.

The 52 current and former cheerleaders covered in the Bergen County case were all members of the squad known as The Flight Crew during the 2012 and 2013 seasons.

The lawsuit was filed in August 2014 by a former cheerleader identified only as “Krystal C.” in the court documents. Her lawyer, Patricia V. Pierce, said none of the women in the class action were identified by name in the lawsuit to protect them from other problems, including stalkers.

According to Pierce, the women were paid $150 per game and issued cheerleader uniforms but were not paid for other work.

She said their compensation did not include time spent learning cheerleader routines and practicing them. She said they were not reimbursed for expenses they incurred to conform to the image required of the cheerleading squad.

For example, all the cheerleaders were required to have straight hair, Pierce said. So Krystal, who has naturally curly hair, had to have hers straightened.

Pierce said the team did not pay for time and cost of travel to and from home games. The squad did not attend road games, she said.

“When you figure all that up, they were making less than minimum wage,” Pierce said.

She said the Jets changed their employment practices with cheerleaders after Krystal filed the suit.

Jets spokesman Bruce Speight referred to a statement drafted when the two sides first reached a preliminary agreement to settle the case in August.

“The Jets deny the claims and the parties have agreed to a settlement to avoid the expense, time and distraction of litigation,” the statement read. A spokes­man for the team could not be reached for comment.

As part of the settlement, Jets made no admission of “any liability of wrongdoing whatsoever.”

Under the terms of the agreement, the women will receive $2,559 to $5,913 each, depending upon whether they worked one or both seasons and whether they took part in 2012 and 2013 photo shoots for the Jets’ annual Flight Crew calendars.

Krystal also was awarded an additional $5,000 for her role in initiating the class action lawsuit. All told, the 52 women will receive $205,433.

Their lawyers will be paid about $112,000 in fees and expenses. An additional $6,500 will go to a claims administrator.

The lawsuit is part of a larger trend involving current and former cheerleaders contesting the terms of their compensation.

According to an April 2014 story in the Los Angeles Times, former cheerleaders for the Oakland Raiders, Cincinnati Bengals and the Buffalo Bills have filed lawsuits against the teams alleging they were owed compensation for unpaid work.

Earlier this month, state Sen. Loretta Weinberg, D-Teaneck, sponsored a bill that would extend employment protections normally afforded under New Jersey law to cheerleaders affiliated with professional sports teams.

“This would hopefully start calling attention to how these women … are underpaid and not protected,” she said.

Weinberg said she introduced the bill at the request of Assemblywoman Rebecca Seawright, D-N.Y., who along with several other lawmakers has co-sponsored a bill pending in Albany.

The New Jersey bill would require that cheerleaders are covered by laws governing minimum wage and hours, workers’ compensation, unemployment and temporary disability benefits.

Weinberg said she was unaware of any other professional sports teams in New Jersey that have cheerleaders. The Giants do not have a cheerleading squad.

When asked about the pending legislation in New Jersey and New York, NFL spokesman Brian McCarthy said, “We expect clubs to comply with federal, state and local wage laws.”

Pierce said similar legislation had been introduced in California.

“I think it’s long overdue,” Pierce said.

Source: Jets to pay $324,000 to cheerleaders to settle lawsuit over wages — January 26, 2016

Patricia Pierce Named U.S. News’ Best Lawyers 2016

By: RDKInteractive

PHILADELPHIA, PA. October 15, 2015: Greenblatt, Pierce, Funt & Flores’ Employment Lawyer Patricia Pierce Named to U.S. News’ Best Lawyers for 2016.

We are pleased to announce that Patricia Pierce was named the Best Lawyers’ 2016 in Philadelphia. Following her “Lawyer of the Year” accolade for 2013, Patricia Pierce has been selected by her peers for inclusion in the 22nd edition of Best Lawyers in the practice area of Employment Law – Individuals. “Best Lawyers in America” has listed Patricia Pierce as one of the nation’s top employment lawyers since 1995.

We are honored by the recognition and look forward to continuing to serve our clients with the same level of service and experience as we have since our firm was founded nearly 20 years ago. Since its inception in 1983, Best Lawyers has become universally regarded as the definitive arbiter of excellence in the legal profession. Because Best Lawyers is based on an exhaustive peer-review survey in which more than 52,488 leading attorneys submitted approximately 5.5 million evaluations on the abilities of other lawyers in their practice areas – and because lawyers do not pay a fee to be listed – inclusion in Best Lawyers is considered a singular honor. Corporate Counsel magazine has called Best Lawyers “the most respected referral list of attorneys in practice.”

In addition to our continued expansion of attorneys honored by being named U.S. News’ Best Lawyers for 2016, Greenblatt, Pierce, Funt & Flores (formerly Greenblatt, Pierce, Engle, Funt & Flores) received recognition in the U.S. News – Best Lawyers® “Best Law Firms” rankings for the fourth time.

Our firm’s directory page can be viewed on The U.S. News Best Lawyers web site here.

To learn more about how the U.S. News Best Lawyers are selected, please check out U.S. News Best Lawyers Methodology for more information.

South Jersey/Philadelphia Criminal Defense Powerhouse Welcomes 26-year veteran of the Camden County Prosecutor’s Office to the Firm

By: RDKInteractive

Greenblatt, Pierce, Engle, Funt, and Flores, LLC (WGP) is pleased to announce that former Camden County Assistant Prosecutor Michele G. Morgera has joined the firm and will be working in its Haddonfield, New Jersey office. The 26-year veteran of the Prosecutor’s office joins Leonard Baker, Esquire, who is one of the area’s leading criminal attorneys, and Ret. New Jersey Court Judge Irvin Snyder, in the firm’s New Jersey office. Ms. Morgera’s addition means that WGP will have one of the strongest and most experienced criminal defense practices in Southern New Jersey. During her tenure at the Camden County Prosecutor’s office, Ms. Morgera handled thousands of criminal cases and served as Chief of the Grand Jury Unit, Chief of the Career Criminal Fugitive Section, and Chief of the Major Crimes Unit. She has personally tried over one hundred jury trials, including some of the most complicated criminal cases in the region. Ms. Morgera also served as the Police Legal Advisor in Camden County. Ms. Morgera was literally on call 24 hours a day to respond to all of the complicated legal matters and questions from law enforcement. A graduate of LaSalle University (B.A. 1982), Ms. Morgera received her law degree from Rutgers’s School of Law, Camden, in 1986. Additionally, in 2001, Ms. Morgera earned a Master’s in Public Administration from Rutgers’s Newark. She is an active member of the “Literacy Volunteers of Camden County” organization through which she provides reading instruction to adults at the lowest literacy levels. According to Firm Managing Partner Ronald Greenblatt: “We are thrilled that a lawyer of Michele’s tremendous caliber, experience and knowledge of the criminal justice system has joined our criminal defense team. We are now, more than ever, able to provide clients with outstanding criminal defense services from some of the best attorneys in New Jersey and Pennsylvania. Just as important, her knowledge of best practices in internal investigations from the perspective of a seasoned prosecutor adds additional depth to both our Employment Practice and our White Collar Criminal Defense and Corporate Investigations Practice.” Founded over 20 years ago as an aggressive criminal defense law practice, Greenblatt, Pierce, Engle, Funt & Flores (WGP) is an established, full-service law firm with experienced attorneys skilled in all areas of criminal, employment, civil and family law. The firm has offices in Pennsylvania and New Jersey. For more information on the firm or its attorneys, please see www.gpeff.com or contact Ron Greenblatt at 215-735-1600 or ron@gpeff.com. Ms. Morgera can be reached at 845-429-7750 or m.morgera@gpeff.com.

Attorney Ronald L. Greenblatt Speaks on Grand Jury Practice

By: RDKInteractive

Greenblatt, Pierce, Funt & Flores, LLC (WGP), is pleased to announce that partner Ronald L. Greenblatt and Michael J. Engle recently spoke on a special two part CLE entitled “PA Grand Jury Practice: Investigating and Indicting.” The program, sponsored by the Philadelphia Bar Association, was intended to help practitioners understand the grand jury process within Philadelphia and provide insight into the Pennsylvania Investigating Grand Jury Act.

Ronald L. Greenblatt, one of Philadelphia’s most successful criminal defense attorneys, has successfully litigated over 1,000 criminal law trials in the Philadelphia region, covering Pennsylvania and New Jersey, on charges ranging from homicide, homicide by vehicle, sexual assault, serious drug offenses, fraud and other white collar crimes, Internet crimes, DUI, DWI, driving under the influence, insanity defense cases and complex civil rights cases. Recently, Mr. Greenblatt was appointed to serve as an Advisory Board member for the publication of Hon. Daniel J. Anders, Ohlbaum on the Pennsylvania Rules of Evidence (2015 ed. LexisNexis Matthew Bender). A recipient of the prestigious AV rating by Martindale-Hubbell, Mr. Greenblatt is ranked as one of the preeminent lawyers as judged by lawyers and judges in the criminal law field Since 2013, he has been selected to the Pennsylvania Super Lawyers List. A founding member and Master of the Philadelphia Inn of Criminal Court, Mr. Greenblatt is also Vice President of the Eastern District of the Pennsylvania Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (PACDL) and a member of the Executive Committee of the Defender Association of the Philadelphia Alumni Association. Mr. Greenblatt is a member of the Philadelphia and Camden County Bar Associations. A graduate of Rutgers University (1984), Mr. Greenblatt received his law degree from Rutgers University School of Law in 1987.

Founded over 20 years ago as an aggressive criminal defense law practice, Greenblatt, Pierce, Funt & Flores is an established, full-service law firm with experienced attorneys skilled in all areas of state and federal criminal defense, employment law, civil litigation, alternative dispute resolution, and family law. The firm has offices in Pennsylvania and New Jersey. For more information on the firm or its attorneys, please see gpffstaging.wpengine.com.

For additional information, please contact Ronald Greenblatt at 215.735.1600.

Ex-J.P. Morgan Senior Executive Files Suit Against Financial Services Giant

By: RDKInteractive

Ex-J.P. Morgan Senior Executive files suit against financial services giant alleging he was fired because he refused to follow senior managements’ order to scuttle settlement of a pivotal housing discrimination case that was set for argument before the United States Supreme Court. PHILADELPHIA, PA. May 18, 2015: Today in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, Wayne Trotman, former President and CEO for JP Morgan Chase’s (Morgan) middle market business in the Mid-Atlantic market, filed suit against this financial institution alleging wrongful discrimination, retaliation and termination after 19 years of outstanding and distinguished service. As the Complaint details, Mr. Trotman has substantial material evidence that demonstrates that he was terminated when he refused to carry out senior management directives to abuse his position as a Director of The Reinvestment Fund (“TRF”), a nonprofit, to scuttle settlement of a pivotal high profile housing discrimination case that was to be heard by the US Supreme Court. The case, Mt. Holly Citizens in Action Inc. v. Township of Mt. Holly, was believed to be the high Court’s opportunity to strike down the disparate impact theory that the Obama Administration was using to help poor minorities obtain equal lending opportunities. Morgan and other banks wanted the TRF brokered settlement to fail so that the Court would strike down the HUD regulation based theory which had caused them tremendous liability exposure. Morgan senior management, including CEO Jamie Dimon, sought reversal of a Third Circuit Court decision approving use of a “Disparate Impact” Theory by disadvantaged minorities who opposed a racially discriminatory housing project. The case was on appeal to the high court when a nonprofit company offered to broker a settlement which would have mooted the case. To force a high court decision, Morgan senior management ordered its Executive to violate the fiduciary duty he owed as a Director of the non-profit by exerting pressure on the nonprofit to delay or stymie the proposed settlement. The Disparate Impact Theory could have been struck down by Supreme Court if the suit went forward with the greatest impact being felt by low-income minorities. When Mr. Trotman refused to advance Morgan’s agenda, he was fired. Mr. Trotman is being represented by Patricia Pierce and Ronald Greenblatt of the firm Greenblatt, Pierce, Engle Funt & Flores. p.pierce@gpeff.com; ron@gpeff.com. Please feel free to contact them with questions. Founded over 20 years ago as an aggressive criminal defense law practice, Greenblatt, Pierce, Engle, Funt & Flores (WGP) is an established, full-service law firm with experienced attorneys skilled in all areas of state and federal criminal defense, employment law, civil litigation, and family law. The firm has offices in Pennsylvania and New Jersey. For more information on the firm or its attorneys, please see www.gpeff.com. For more information regarding this release, please contact Ronald Greenblatt at 215.735.1600.